
AI Class by Kanary
Knight or Ninja? Your Codex & Claude logs decide
Not a quiz. AI Class reads 30 days of your real Codex and Claude Code logs and turns them into one of 16 RPG classes: Knight, Ninja, Alchemist, Guild Master and 12 more. Six stats show how you actually work: volume, autonomy, chat length, context size, cache reuse and parallelism. Paste one prompt into your agent. It aggregates your logs locally and sends only totals. Conversations, prompts and project names never leave your machine. Free. No install. Your card in about a minute.
AI Analysis
AI Class by Kanary analyzes 30 days of Codex and Claude code logs to assign one of 16 RPG classes (e.g. Knight, Ninja, Alchemist) with six stats: volume, autonomy, chat length, context size, cache reuse, parallelism. Core features include local log aggregation (only totals sent), complete privacy (no conversations or prompts leave device), free access, no install, and results in ~1 minute via a single prompt. It solves developers' lack of visibility and fun insights into their AI coding habits. USP is gamified self-reflection on real usage patterns. Value proposition: engaging, private way to understand and optimize AI-assisted workflows.
Favorable in 2025-2026 with explosive growth and mainstream adoption of AI coding tools like Claude and Copilot. Developers increasingly demand insights into usage patterns for productivity gains amid maturing AI tech and focus on responsible AI. Economic push for efficiency and fun personalization tools align well. Excellent Timing.
High. Low technical difficulty via prompt-based local processing with no install or heavy backend. Minimal dev/operation costs as it's free with no user data storage. Built-in privacy reduces compliance risks. Strong scalability for broad agent use. Potential log format challenges exist but overall low risk and high team fit for AI tool builders. High.
Main segments: Software developers, full-stack engineers, indie hackers and AI enthusiasts aged 25-40 heavily using Claude/Codex. Industries: Software development, tech startups. Geographic: Global with concentration in US, Europe, China tech hubs. TAM for AI dev tools ~$20B by 2026; SAM for usage analytics ~$1B; SOM for fun/individual tools ~$100M. Core pains: opaque AI habits and inefficiency. Moderate willingness to pay (currently free, potential freemium).
Low. Direct competitors: 1. GitHub Copilot Usage Insights (github.com/features/copilot), 2. Anthropic Usage Console (console.anthropic.com), 3. Cursor Analytics (cursor.com), 4. LinearB AI Dev Analytics (linearb.io). Advantages: unique RPG gamification, superior privacy via local-only processing, fun UX, free. Disadvantages: lighter on enterprise-grade metrics, may lack depth for power users vs professional analytics platforms.
Upgrade Pro to unlock full AI analysis
Similar Products

Cohere Parse 5
Turn complex docs, tables & images into AI-ready data
▲ 158 votes

Adapt
The company brain that gets work done
▲ 124 votes

Tapfree for Chrome
Voice dictation that adapts to what’s on your screen
▲ 122 votes

Replay QA Security Scan
Automated Penetration Testing for AI-Built Apps
▲ 102 votes

Kosshi
Simple, fast outliner for Mac and iPhone.
▲ 90 votes

Thoughts for Mac
Capture notes from your menubar using text, images or voice
▲ 90 votes