
Liquid Inference
LLM router where providers compete for every prompt

* Fully compatible with agentic coding tools: Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, Pi, Cline, and many more. Full multi-modal support. * Hundreds of open- and closed-weight models. Create routing rule presets or use our Auto routing algorithms. * Providers compete dynamically on price for every prompt, offering the lowest marginal cost. * Sign up for free with email, first 500 users get $20 of free inference. Receive 20% of referred fees as free inference, 10% for second-level referrals.
AI Analysis
Liquid Inference is an LLM router enabling dynamic price competition among providers for every prompt to ensure lowest costs. Core features: full compatibility with agentic tools like Cursor, Claude Code, Codex; support for hundreds of multi-modal open/closed models; custom routing presets or auto algorithms. It solves pain points of high inference expenses, complex model selection, and inefficient routing in AI workflows. Value proposition: affordable, optimized inference with free signup credits ($20 for first 500 users), multi-level referral rewards (20%/10%), and seamless integration for developers.
In 2025-2026, timing is favorable with booming AI agents, proliferation of LLM providers/models, and strong demand for cost optimization amid rising inference expenses. Technology for routing is mature, developer adoption of tools like Cursor is accelerating, and economic pressures prioritize efficiency. Excellent Timing.
Feasibility is High. Technical routing and multi-provider integration are established (similar to existing proxies), with strong scalability via cloud. Development costs are moderate for API orchestration; main risks are securing broad provider participation for true dynamic competition and ensuring compliance/API reliability. Good team fit for AI infra experts with high growth potential.
Main segments: AI/software developers and engineers using coding agents (Cursor, etc.), indie hackers, AI startups/enterprises optimizing LLM costs. Global distribution, concentrated in US, Europe, China tech hubs. TAM for LLM inference ~$10B+, SAM for routers/gateways ~$500M+, SOM ~$50M. Core pains: high variable costs, model choice overload. Strong willingness to pay usage-based fees for savings via competition.
Competition level: Medium. Direct competitors: 1. OpenRouter (openrouter.ai), 2. LiteLLM (litellm.ai), 3. Portkey (portkey.ai), 4. Helicone (helicone.ai). Advantages: unique per-prompt dynamic provider price competition for lowest cost, deep agentic tool compatibility, referral incentives. Disadvantages: newer player with potentially less proven reliability/scale, depends on active provider bidding ecosystem vs. static pricing in competitors.
Upgrade Pro to unlock full AI analysis
Similar Products

Cohere Parse 5
Turn complex docs, tables & images into AI-ready data
▲ 158 votes

Opaline
PostHog for team Claude Code and Codex sessions.
▲ 141 votes

Adapt
The company brain that gets work done
▲ 124 votes

Tapfree for Chrome
Voice dictation that adapts to what’s on your screen
▲ 122 votes

CodeBurn
See where your AI coding spend actually goes
▲ 101 votes

WikiFix for Confluence
Find and fix issues in your knowledge base
▲ 86 votes