MCP-Billing

OAuth 2.1 + usage-based Stripe billing for MCP servers

SaaSDeveloper ToolsGitHubAPI

▲ 0 votes5 commentsLaunched Jul 28, 2026

Daily #11Weekly #41

Self-hosted Next.js/TypeScript boilerplate: full OAuth 2.1 + PKCE, API key management with zero-downtime rotation, usage-based Stripe billing, and Redis rate limiting. 7 modules, 300+ tests. One-time €79, no revenue share, no platform lock-in. The metering core is free and open source on npm.

AI Analysis

📝 Summary

MCP-Billing is a self-hosted Next.js/TypeScript boilerplate providing full OAuth 2.1 + PKCE, API key management with zero-downtime rotation, usage-based Stripe billing, and Redis rate limiting. It includes 7 modules and 300+ tests. Offered as a one-time €79 purchase with no revenue share or platform lock-in; the metering core is free and open-source on npm. It solves developer pain points in implementing secure authentication, accurate usage metering, rate limiting, and avoiding vendor lock-in or revenue cuts when building MCP servers. Value proposition: a reliable, production-ready kit for fast setup with complete control and efficiency.

📈 Market Timing

In 2025-2026, market timing is strong due to booming AI/API services relying on usage-based billing, rising demand for self-hosted tools to ensure data privacy and avoid lock-in, maturing OAuth 2.1 standards, and developer preference for one-time purchases amid economic caution. Aligns perfectly with open-source and control-focused trends. Excellent Timing.

✅ Feasibility

Leverages mature tech stack (Next.js, TypeScript, Stripe, Redis) with 300+ tests, minimizing technical difficulty and dev costs for users. Low operational costs via self-hosting, minimal supply chain or compliance risks (user-managed). Strong scalability and fit for dev teams. High

🎯 Target Market

Main segments: indie developers, full-stack engineers, SaaS/AI startup founders building API or MCP servers (tech industry focus). Global but concentrated in North America/Europe; ages 25-45, tech-savvy. TAM for devtools >$20B, SAM for auth/billing starters ~$500M, SOM ~$10M. Pain points: complex auth/billing integration from scratch. High willingness to pay €79 for time savings.

⚔️ Competition

Medium. Direct competitors: 1. ShipFast (shipfast.dev), 2. MakerKit (makerkit.dev), 3. Next.js SaaS Boilerplate templates on GitHub, 4. Clerk (clerk.com), 5. BoxyHQ (boxyhq.com). Advantages: fully self-hosted, no rev share/lock-in, OAuth 2.1 focus, zero-downtime keys, open-source metering, extensive tests. Disadvantages: requires self-management, potentially smaller ecosystem than hosted platforms.

Upgrade Pro to unlock full AI analysis